Write a 4 page paper in which you:
1. Assess the types of changes and new developments in technology and government regulations that should be considered in long-range planning requirements for updating or replacing a HRIS.
2. Identify three (3) disadvantages (other than time) of using interviews and focus groups for data collection during the analysis phase when determining HRIS needs. Recommend three (3) approaches to overcome the disadvantages.
3. Assess three (3) critical sources of data-gathering initiatives for an HRIS needs analysis and highlight the advantages and disadvantages of using each of those sources.
4. Identify a system, process, or service in your organization’s HRIS that could be improved. Compare the current system, process, or service (where it is now) with the envisioned future (where it is going) and then create a gap analysis report that identifies the discrepancies between the current state and the future desired state and prioritizes needs.
5. Use at least three (3) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting guidelines:
· Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
· Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
· Analyze the strategy of the organization, the HR strategy, and HR programs with HRIS.
· Create an HRIS needs analysis and evaluate the acquisition process.
· Use technology and information resources to research issues in human resource information systems.
· Write clearly and concisely about human resource information systems using proper writing mechanics.
Click here to view the grading rubric.
Click here to view the grading rubric.
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
|
Points: 150
|
Assignment 2: Determining HRIS Needs
|
|
Criteria
|
Unacceptable
Below 70% F
|
Fair
70-79% C
|
Proficient
80-89% B
|
Exemplary
90-100% A
|
|
1. Assess the types of changes and new developments in technology and government regulations that should be considered in long-range planning requirements for updating or replacing an HRIS.
Weight: 20%
|
Did not submit or incompletely assessed the types of changes and new developments in technology and government regulations that should be considered in long-range planning requirements for updating or replacing an HRIS.
|
Partially assessed the types of changes and new developments in technology and government regulations that should be considered in long-range planning requirements for updating or replacing an HRIS.
|
Satisfactorily assessed the types of changes and new developments in technology and government regulations that should be considered in long-range planning requirement s for updating or replacing an HRIS.
|
Thoroughly assessed the types of changes and new developments in technology and government regulations that should be considered in long-range planning requirements for updating or replacing an HRIS.
|
|
2. Identify three (3) disadvantages (other than time) of using interviews and focus groups for data collection during the analysis phase when determining HRIS needs. Recommend three (3) approaches to overcome the disadvantages.
Weight: 20%
|
Did not submit or incompletely identified three (3) disadvantages (other than time) of using interviews and focus groups for data collection during the analysis phase when determining HRIS needs. Did not submit or incompletely recommended three (3) approaches to overcome the disadvantages.
|
Partially identified three (3) disadvantages (other than time) of using interviews and focus groups for data collection when determining HRIS needs. Partially recommended three (3) approaches to overcome those disadvantages.
|
Satisfactorily identified three (3) disadvantages (other than time) of using interviews and focus groups for data collection when determining HRIS needs. Satisfactorily recommended three (3) approaches to overcome those disadvantages.
|
Thoroughly identified three (3) disadvantages (other than time) of using interviews and focus groups for data collection when determining HRIS needs. Thoroughly recommended three (3) approaches to overcome those disadvantages.
|
|
3. Assess three (3) critical sources of data- gathering initiatives for an HRIS needs analysis and highlight the advantages and disadvantages of using each of those sources.
Weight: 20%
|
Did not submit or incompletely assessed three (3) critical sources of data-gathering initiatives for an HRIS needs analysis. Did not submit or incompletely highlighted the advantages and disadvantages of using each of those sources.
|
Partially assessed three (3) critical sources of data- gathering initiatives for an HRIS needs analysis. Partially highlighted the advantages and disadvantages of using each of those sources.
|
Satisfactorily assessed three (3) critical sources of data-gathering initiatives for an HRIS needs analysis. Satisfactorily highlighted the advantages and disadvantages of using each of those sources.
|
Thoroughly assessed three (3) critical sources of data-gathering initiatives for an HRIS needs analysis. Thoroughly highlighted the advantages and disadvantages of using each of those sources.
|
|
4. Identify a system, process, or service in your organization’s HRIS that could be improved. Compare the current system, process, or service (where it is now) with the envisioned future (where it is going) and then create a gap analysis report that identifies the discrepancies between the current state and the future desired state and prioritizes needs.
Weight: 25%
|
Did not submit or incompletely identified a system, process, or service in your organization’s HRIS that could be improved. Did not submit or incompletely compared the current system, process, or service (where it is now) with the envisioned future (where is it going). Did not submit or incompletely created a gap analysis report that identifies the discrepancies between the current state and the future desired state and prioritizes needs.
|
Partially identified a system, process, or service in your organization’s HRIS that could be improved. Partially compared the current system, process, or service (where it is now) with the envisioned system (where it is going). Partially created a gap analysis report that identifies the discrepancies between the current state and the future desired state and prioritizes needs.
|
Satisfactorily identified a system, process, or service in your organization’s HRIS that could be improved. Satisfactorily compared the current system, process, or service (where it is now) with the envisioned system (where it is going). Satisfactorily created a gap analysis report that identifies the discrepancies between the current state and the future desired state and prioritizes needs.
|
Thoroughly identified a system, process, or service in your organization’s HRIS that could be improved. Thoroughly compared the current system, process, or service (where it is now) with the envisioned system (where it is going). Thoroughly created a gap analysis report that identifies the discrepancies between the current state and the future desired state and prioritizes needs.
|
|
5. 3 references
Weight: 5%
|
No references provided
|
Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.
|
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.
|
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
|
|
6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements
Weight: 10%
|
More than 6 errors present
|
5-6 errors present
|
3-4 errors present
|
0-2 errors present
|
